H B Wilton - Magic in Sydney

Magic in Sydney

Click for menu
Go to content
H. B. Wilton and The Somatic Conjuror

The legendary magician and pianist, Robert Heller, came to perform in Australia in 1869 and was immediately beset by two attacks on his profession. This essay, regarding a small booklet which wilfully exposed his techniques, is an overly-detailed and pedantic examination of a tiny part of Heller's story. However, it is the first part of several tales which ultimately help to complete the sorely under-documented history of Heller in Australia. It also creates links to other magicians and the theatrical world of the 1860s and 70s, and solves some minor mysteries.  A second related essay concerns Heller's rival, William Adam "W.A." Chapman.  

William Henry Palmer  - Robert Heller
William Palmer (c.1829-1878) was the British son of a skilled church musician, and developed into an exceptional pianist himself. His other fascination was with magic, in particular the career of the great French magician Jean Eugene Robert-Houdin, and in his early career from the 1850s, "Robert Heller" was a close copyist of Houdin's illusions. However, he went on to develop his own style of light comic performance and in a career which spanned two major periods as a magician, broken by some years away from the magic stage, he secured his fame in the United States as one of the pre-eminent performers and inspirations to other magicians. His fame was so great that Harry Keller changed his surname to Kellar to avoid being accused of trading on the earlier performer.

Quoting magic historian John Mulholland, "American magicians never can repay the debt they owe to Robert Heller, for his performances were the first to attract Society to the shows of mystery workers. By his appearances in the eighteen fifties and sixties, and again in the latter part of the seventies, he gave magic and magicians a standing in America which previously neither had had. Earlier performers had not had his finesse, his cultured manner, nor his delightfully unpretentious delivery."

While this is not the place to give a detailed biography of Heller, his influence was enormous, and his time in Australia and New Zealand inspired devotees, copyists, and opportunists.

Heller's Arrival in Australia
Heller arrived in Melbourne from California in early September 1869, under the auspices of theatre entrepreneur George Coppin, and moved north to open in Sydney on the twentieth,  for a limited season. The advertising was done in a quite understated manner, Heller appearing  at the School of Arts in Pitt Street. Although the School of Arts was refurbished with a new stage and drapes for the occasion, it was really a hall for educational lectures, rather than an ostentatious theatre.
Giving both magic performances and recitations on the piano, Heller enjoyed a highly successful Sydney season until November 1, after which he moved to Melbourne

Mr W.A. Chapman, who is the subject of a separate essay, had arrived in Australia with Heller, but almost immediately (by October 25) set up in business with a show comprised of a close copy of Heller's magic. He had gone to Melbourne in advance of Robert Heller's arrival, opening at Weston's Opera House (in Bourke Street, and more usually named as "St. George's Hall"), initially listing his own name as the show's manager. Within days, on October 29, the manager's name was listed as H.B.Wilton, the subject of this essay.

Heller opened in Melbourne on November 18,  once again in a hall refurbished to suit his purposes, at his "Temple of Wonders", or the Apollo Hall, advertised as 172 Bourke Street East.
His first review was exceptional: - 'Mr Robert Heller, the far-famed conjuror and pianist, made his first appearance before a Melbourne audience ... the hall ... was crowded to excess by a fashionable and enthusiastic audience, and the entertainment was an unqualified success, literally [?!] bringing down the house ... a series of brilliant triumphs ... the execution of the musical part of the entertainment proved that Mr. Heller is even greater as a musician than as a magician, while the supernatural part of the programme ... formed an appropriate climax to the whole." (1)

The 'Supernatural' part of Heller's programme was his "Second Sight" routine in which his blindfolded assistant (in Australia calling herself Haydee or Haidee Heller, though she was not a relation) described objects handed to Heller in the audience. Two-person mindreading, still a feat performed by modern mentalists, dates back to Pinetti in 1784, and Heller probably learned the techniques from observing Robert-Houdin's performance or via his pupil, Macallister, based on a coding system.
Heller's unique twist was to add a test in which his assistant was covered with a shawl and continued to describe objects without a word passing between the pair. (2) This combination of methods helped to deceive the viewers and made his 'Second Sight' routine the major feature of his show.

Heller's triumphant journey throughout Australia is told separately, but by March 1870 he had travelled to Ballarat, then to Adelaide, Geelong and Melbourne again, and would go on to tour New Zealand (3) returning to Sydney at the end of the year.

The Somatic Conjuror
In his advertising, Robert Heller referred to himself as a "Somatic Conjuror", and Part 1 of his programme as "Somatic Conjuring". In terms of the definition of "somatic" (or 'pertaining to the body'), we suspect Heller was probably only interested in something that sounded mysterious. The 'Australasian' of November 13, 1869, took up the task of deciphering his billing:
"And talking of Mr Heller, I am glad he calls himself a conjuror. I am fond of the old-fashioned words, just as I like 'schoolmaster' better than 'principal', school rather than 'collegiate institution', barber than 'artist in hair' and inn or tavern than 'hotel'. But why 'Somatic Conjuror?' Is he afraid of being confounded with the spiritists? Nobody at this day, I take it, supposes conjuring to be effect by any other than somatic agency. I am glad, however, he does not call himself a magician or a wizard, or a prestidigitator, or a professor of legerdemain. He announces himself as a conjuror - never mind that he says he is a somatic conjuror. Somatic, like 'mobled', is good if you only know the meaning of it, and you have only to bear in mind that 'soma' is Greek for body, and that somatic, therefore, means bodily or corporeal, and that therefore Mr. Heller probably means, in using it, to assure us that he has no dealings with - let us say - Mephistopheles. The old notion of a conjuror was that he had dealings with Mephistopheles and that nothing short of Mephistophelian confederacy could make plum-puddings boil in a hat. It is not clear that in these Spiritism times something of this feeling has not been revived. Hence Mr. Heller's use of the term 'somatic'; though if he had said bodily or corporeal, maybe he would have been more generally understood, and the assurance would have extended further."
In December 1869, while Heller was still in Melbourne, a small booklet was announced, listing a number of magic tricks which would be explained by the author. It seems that the book had not yet been finalised, since the resulting publication did not feature all the tricks promised; but by January 1870 it emerged from the printers and publishers Clarson, Massina & Co of Little Collins Street. (4) It was titled "The Somatic Conjuror: A Treatise on Natural and Scientific Magic, Including the latest novelties, SUPERNATURAL VISION, or, SECOND SIGHT, The Cherubs in the Air, The Floating Head, The Sphinx, Etc. Etc."

An unassuming booklet of just 60 pages, with nothing more than a plain paper cover, its author was shown as H. B. Wilton, "Sometime Practical Operator to Mons. Philippe, Agent to De Beer, Agent and Coadjutor to Professor Ion, and others."




First Edition of The Somatic Conjuror
View The Somatic Conjuror online at SLV -


Its publication in 1870 places the booklet among possibly the four earliest-known works on magic to be published in Australia (5) so it is significant for that alone. But, possibly to Heller's private dismay, the book would explain what was claimed to be many of his methods.
Descriptions were given for these tricks: (List marked RH if the effect was seen in Heller's show)
"Second Sight" RH
The Sphinx illusion RH
The Floating Head RH
Cherubs in the Air
Mass production of items from a hat (followed by the production of a lady's skirt, from which a lady is then produced) RH
Confetti to Coffee
Aerial Money production RH
Predicting the total of a chosen series of numbers
Pocket watch shot from a pistol and found in a bottle
The 'Silver Rings' or linking rings RH
Production of confectionery from a handkerchief (Phillippe's "The Modern Confectioner")
Production of Feather Plumes RH
Coin in ball of wool
Transposition of a wooden cone and a glass of wine
The Gun Trick RH (though the description is a shadow of Heller's routine)
The Magnetised Cane
Production of eggs from a bag
Bowl of Ink changes to a fishbowl RH
Three spoon divination
Guessing which hand holds a ball
False knots in a handkerchief
Vanishing coin (pull)
A number of optical and scientific stunts, minor feats of mathematical mindreading RH, puzzles, and a self-working trick using the Pendulum principle.

A Volume Two was promised, "will contain a complete series of new magical experiments, including "The Witch's Rod" RH , the "Desiccated Canaries" RH, "The Indian Basket Illusion", "The Head of Socrates", "Mahomet's Coffin" and others. (This volume does not appear to have ever been published).
Also mentioned at the end of the book, "Ladies and gentlemen can, on application to the author of this pamphlet, obtain the system of Supernatural Vision, or Second Sight, complete terms as arranged."

Many of the tricks described were old effects which can be found in sources such as Robert-Houdin's 'Secrets of Conjuring and Magic'; they are explained with enough accuracy that a casual reader might fancy that they understood the entire secret. Heller himself was not an inventor of magic, and started his own career in imitation of the great Frenchman Jean Eugene Robert-Houdin. But to have an "expose" circulating at the time he was appearing in Melbourne implies that Heller's business might be seriously damaged.
While it is possible that Wilton 'compiled' rather than 'authored' the book, as yet no evidence has been found that he lifted his text directly from earlier works. However in 1879 the anti-spiritualist magician, Samri Baldwin, published his own booklet in Melbourne, "Spirit Mediums Exposed", and the text from page 49 - 57 is stolen word for word out of The Somatic Conjuror.

In the opening pages of The Somatic Conjuror, the author is at pains to explain that he has a clear and moral reason for attacking another man's livelihood:
"By some unprincipled persons the results of scientific investigation have been attributed to secret communications with beings of a more remote and refined state of existence - in other words, with disembodied spirits; and a large body of the public have incredulously been deceived into a belief that the spirits of departed parents and friends … hold privileged communication with us through some spiritually appointed or gifted medium… Thus it was that the Davenport Brothers for so long a time were able to delude their victims and perpetrate their frauds, to the physical and moral injury of their followers … The principal object therefore, in this publication is to disabuse the public mind respecting such things as "Spiritual Vision" or Second Sight, and give the necessary explanations as to how and by what means they are effected.
The writer also desires it to be distinctly understood that his object in publishing this pamphlet (apart from it being a commercial speculation) is not from any ungenerous motive to expose the business or occupation of the conjuror or legerdemainist; for were it so, he himself would suffer from the inconveniences arising from exposure when engaged in the business. Nor is it to gratify the curiosity of children only, for whom Handbooks on Magic in numbers have been written and published, but to afford information to such who are always inquiring " What is it ?" and 'How is it done?" … The writer hopes that the effect of this publication, will be to raise this class of entertainment above what at one time was considered its fixed standard viz. the occupation of a vulgar street mountebank … "

Aside from the truthful remark that "he himself would suffer" (because, as will be seen later, the author had a vested interest in the business of magicians), little credibility can be attached to Wilton's stated intention. He admits the book to be a commercial speculation, and while magicians have had a long and honourable history of speaking out against false spiritualism and psychics, it can hardly be thought that Heller's Second Sight routine, coming amongst a programme of appearing coins and feathers, items from a top hat, magical linking rings, and a concert of piano music, could be misconstrued by any audience as being anything but mystifying entertainment. If it were the true intention of the author to speak up against "the spirits", he was hardly working towards that goal by revealing how to make a coin appear in a ball of wool, or to produce a shower of sweets from a handkerchief. Exactly how a pocket book of exposed secrets would help to improve the perception of magic as a vulgar entertainment, is also unclear. Robert Heller, in fact, was achieving that very goal by attracting fashionable audiences to his performances of magic and classical music.
Wilton was closer to the mark when he admitted that The Somatic Conjuror's purpose was to "afford information to such who are always inquiring 'What is it ?' and 'How is it done?' "

Magic historian, Will Alma, (6) speculates that H.B. Wilton might have gone into print possibly because he had sought to be Heller's advance agent and was rejected; a reasonable speculation based on what we will learn of Wilton's identity - except that Robert Heller's sponsor was the juggernaut of Australian Theatre, George Coppin. The entrepreneur who also brought the Wizard Jacobs to Australia was a man of such energy and clout that it seems unlikely that Wilton would have ever been in a position to go into battle with the great man.

Reviews of The Somatic Conjuror
Responses to the book were relatively few, unsurprising since it was hardly a major publishing event. By and large the reviewers were of the opinion that the tricks had been explained earlier, and that people's awareness of the methods did not take anything away from the cleverness or showmanship of the performer. Notably they mentioned not only Heller, but his competitor, W.A. Chapman as being on the receiving end of the expose.
The book, which sold for 6d. apparently did sufficiently well to warrant a second edition, selling at 1/- , though not the second volume of secrets which had been promised. The second edition had an updated cover and was now titled "The Wizard and Somatic Conjuror - Natural Magic". The publication date is confirmed as 1870, since the internal title page is a replica of the original, and Clarson Massina's Almanac for the coming year, 1871, features two advertisements for the work.

Second Edition cover

Heller's reaction, as far as we can judge, was to completely ignore the publication. His Melbourne season was a triumph, and he went on to tour with huge success around the Southern states. Robert Heller, after all, was not dependent on the mechanical secrets of his magic. He had taken existing tricks and illusions and made them his own through his personality. Playing the character of a dryly humorous American (though he was British), it was his witty conversation which carried the day; and Heller was a man who frequently set aside his magic and dazzled audiences with unquestioned talent on the pianoforte. Even today, exposers come and go, but the success of a magician's performance depends more on whether the audience likes them, than on the mechanics behind their mysteries.

Mar 26 1870 - Sydney Punch
The Somatic Conjuror. Mr. H. B. Wilton has published an interesting little work, entitled the Somatic Conjuror, a treatise on natural and scientific magic, and supernatural vision or second sight, in which he affords information upon several matters which have caused the greatest surprise and wonder. In it he gives the necessary explanations as to how and by what means the wonderful performances of the conjuror and legerdemainist are effected. The book will be read with much interest by the lovers of mystery and magic ; and second sight, the cherubs in the air, the floating head, the sphinx, the magic hat, aerial money, the magic bullets, &c. , will remain mysteries no longer.

January 14 1870 - The Herald (Melbourne)
The Somatic Conjuror.- Heller's occupation is threatened with extinction. A Mr. Wilton has published a pamphlet under the above title. All the tricks that have been so successfully accomplished by the prestidigitators of late are here exposed. While the modus operandi is revealed, there is one thing the book cannot confer, and that is the sleight of hand necessary for the successful performance of the magical deeds.

January 15 1870 - The Age
We have received from Messrs. Clarson, Massina and Co., a pamphlet entitled, The Somatic Conjuror: a treatise on Natural and Scientific Magic. The author is Mr. H.B. Wilton. It does not seem to us that he has shed any new light on a very old subject. Most of his so-called revelations can be found in Wyman's Magic (published in America), or in Hartz, a book published to explain what Supernatural vision really is. In 1850, that meritorious publication, the Family Herald, devoted pages to the subject of which Mr. Wilton principally treats, viz., second sight.
Besides, Professor Anderson and many others have published handbooks on the same subject. In his pamphlet, the author or compiler seems to aim at a given hidden object. But in doing so, he has forgotten that conjuring is an art, mysterious in itself no doubt to the uninitiated, but perfectly explicable to the performer. The public don't stoop to inquire curiously into the way in which a certain trick is performed, but they merely ask themselves if the trick is performed cleverly. For instance an intelligent mind can grasp the meaning of Shakespeare, though he cannot himself illustrate that meaning, so as to make it presentable to other minds of an equal calibre to his own. Again, we all know how the piano is played, but unfortunately for us we are not all Thalbergs or Hellers. Mr. Wilton's explanation of the second sight business we have read carefully through, and after reading it, are just as far off coming to a conclusion on the subject as ever. Mr. Wilton's proposition is certainly the most reasonable, but who's to understand it? Most of all who's to work it out ? Could he do so himself with the aid of an intelligent assistant, after, say, a month's practice? We doubt it.

February 5 1870 - Leader, Melbourne
The Drama - Heller's last programme is his greatest. I don't know that I haven't said that before, but whether I have or not it may stand. For, of a surety every one of Mr. Heller's programmes has excelled its predecessor. He seems to have started at zero (and zero for him, was a very wonderful zero) and gradually to have worked up to an extraordinary pitch of perfection. The goblin drum business is extraordinary as is the second sight of Miss Haydee, and fairly puzzles the crowds who witness it. Fancy a drum (or rather a series of drums) beaten by invisible hands and playing a variety of tunes to command while perched on the knee of an obese elderly gentleman in the stalls. The canary trick is also a very wonderful effect. But I might, were I so inclined, write a column or so about Heller, only I fancy people had best judge of these sort of things for themselves.
I have read the Somatic Conjuror through and through, till I am tired reading it, and I am quite certain I could not to-morrow do one of Mr. Heller's tricks if I tried. To me, Mr. Heller's music is more wonderful than his magic. All of it that I understand are those simple ballad tunes into which he throws a world of that tenderness of expression which someone before I was born called heavenly. His 'Auld Robin Gray,' for instance, thrills through you like a by-gone memory, vibrating about the most sensitive portions of your anatomy with a bewildering effect. Enough of Heller - I am so enchanted with the man that I fear to write of him at length, lest I should be accused of having taken wine with him, a sin of which I can conscientiously declare I have never been guilty.

April 4 1870 - Bendigo Advertiser
MESSRS. CLARSON, MASSINA AND CO'S PUBLICATIONS.
We are glad to see that the enterprise of this firm in trying to form a literature for Victoria appears to be meeting with a little of the appreciation it deserves, although not with the full amount. Native literature seems to meet with great difficulties in these colonies owing to the amount of English and American books, and periodicals which flood the market, and place colonial writers and publishers out of the running. The enterprise of Clarson, Massina, and Co, therefore, in endeavoring to rear up a colonial literature ought to meet with the aid of our reading population, as the class of works submitted by them to the public are of such a kind as to commend themselves to attention on their own merits.
The Somatic Conjuror, by Mr H. B. Wilton, is also published by Clarson, Messina and Co, and professes to give a full and particular account of how all the wonders of Heller and Chapman are done, and so far as we have read the little brochure, it certainly gives a very tangible explanation. At all events the little work is very readable, and all of the innumerable youngsters who imagine they have legerdemain talents would do well to purchase it, as it certainly will give some insight into how these things are done, and how they can "do" their more obtuse friends and relatives.

January 20, 1870 - Melbourne Punch (it should be noted that Punch was traditionally a satirical magazine!)
Under the portentous title of The Somatic Conjurer [sic.], a Mr. H. B. WILTON hat issued a small pamphlet purporting to be an explanation of the various wizard's tricks that have been practised here and elsewhere. The author or compiler has in this little work shown a certain amount ability in rendering the character of its contents illucid and powerfully confusing. He appears thoroughly to understand the principles upon which failure can be accomplished. The happy manner in which he conceals any real knowledge of the subject on which he has written evinces talent, and he must be congratulated upon the great success that attends his efforts in this direction. It might be said that spite or ill-nature has induced him to turn common informer, and so endeavour to injure those with whom he professes to be professionally connected, or that envy of others possessing superior ability, accompanied with recognised success, has caused the book to be issued. But such accusations must fail, for with Mr. WILTON'S explanations HELLER'S extraordinary tricks are more puzzling than before, and the details of the system of second sight prove to be simply ridiculous. The pamphlet appears to be a collection of tricks that have been years ago published in various books, such as the Family Herald, Boy's Own Book, etc., slightly altered by being deprived of one feature, comprehensibility. The cloak of novelty that is so mysteriously wrapt around them is a capital trick, but that even requires elucidation. The publication will without doubt prove a great sell, for in its attempts to expose sleight of hand it exposes slight of brain.

The Identity of H. B. Wilton and connections to magicians
We turn now to the identity of the author of "The Somatic Conjuror", H.B. Wilton. It turns out that he was far from being some anonymous hack; in fact Wilton's history is so extensive that we will confine this overview to the years leading up to, and through, Heller's travels in Australia. We will look also at his connection with various magicians of the same era.

H. B. Wilton first makes an appearance in Geelong on June 12 1866, a performer in an entertainment called "Evenings at home". The company moved on to Bendigo and by July 31 they were at Castlemaine Mechanic's Institute, with Miss Kate Sedgwick (Soprano), Mr Edwin A. Reeves (Baritone) and "Mr Henry B. Wilton, Tenor and Comic Vocalist, from London and Provincial Theatres." (which claim we may take with a large grain of salt.)
Of interest is that in between various farces and concert items, a magician, Professor Fuller, "the astounding Illusionist and Ventriloquist from Californian and New York Theatres", gave a programme of 'Natural Magic and Spirit Rapping Extraordinary'. Professor Fuller (7) was seen in Australia only from August 1866 to May 1867 when he advised that he had to return to Europe on urgent business.

For Wilton and company, the July 31 performance in front of a hardened audience comprised of gold miners from Sandhurst, could not have gone worse:
A DRAMATIC, MAGICAL AND MUSICAL PERFORMANCE. (8)
"Judging from the reception which Miss Kate Sedgwick's dramatic, magical and musical company, from the London, New York, and California theatres, received on Saturday night, at the Lyceum Theatre, the merits of the company are not appreciated by a Sandhurst audience. The whole performance was one of the most mediocre description. Miss Kate Sedgwick sang, and showed she had a sweet voice to delight a small party; the magical efforts of Professor Fuller, would not astound a crowd of the commonest little ragamuffins; Mr E. A. Reeves, a baritone singer, electrified the house - by the way well filled in the pit - by singing a celebrated drinking song, entitled, "The Men of Merry, Merry England," which having an easy and good-going chorus; was enthusiastically joined in by the audience. The great event of the evening, however, was the debut of the comic vocalist, Mr H. B. Wilton. From the first, the audience were taken with him, and joined in the refrain of the first song "Away down Holborn Hill." The singer came to grief in the next attempt "Down in Piccadilly" and came to a tragical end in the "Love leap, or the story of William and Blue-eyed Nell." The audience, for want of better amusement, drowned the funny man in their favorite choruses of "Old John Brown" and "Away down Holborn Hill," to which place he was recommended to hasten. The concluding piece of the performance was, what the posters call, the screaming farce of "The Troubles of Handy Andy," Mr H. B. Wilton as that celebrated personage in the negro development. It was soon apparent that the farce was a farce indeed, and the troubles of Handy Andy were more than calculated on, for the audience hissed and shouted and chorused and roared till the performance was brought to a premature end, when there was a general clearing out, and no time was lost in turning off the gas.
We understand that the programme for to-night will be entirely changed. On Wednesday night the attraction of the Roland Troupe of Acrobats is to be added to the performance."

Even more astonishing than the disaster of their show, was that the company was playing in direct competition to the final evening in Castlemaine of the Wizard Jacobs, George Coppin's first major magical import, and a giant personality in Australia at the time.

In September 1866, Mr Wilton turned himself into a conjuror. He appeared on a Benefit night at the Mechanics' Institute Ballarat, for Brother W.M.Brown, a member of the Oddfellows and, as it happens, the magician William Maxwell Brown (1829-1886). This night was billed as "Rival Wizards! New Illusions!" Mr. Brown had returned from Europe in April, bringing with him the illusions being performed by Colonel Stodare in London - The Sphinx, the Indian Basket Illusion and Growth of Flowers; his story will be added to our sydneymagic.net history site at a future date. Wilton acted on Brown's behalf in October, when he came to Melbourne.

Also on the bill was Miss Emma Wilton, characteristic vocalist from Canterbury Hall, London. This is most likely Emma Weippert (1850-1939) of the Weippert family of musicians (9), a singer who came to be well-regarded in theatrical circles, and the wife of Mr H.B. Wilton since June 1866.

OTHER MAGICIANS :- Mr H.B. Wilton was listed in the benefit advertisement as 'Premiere Prestidigitateur and late colleague of the celebrated M.Phillippe'. As 'The Somatic Conjuror' title page states that Wilton had been "Sometime Practical Operator to Mons. Phillippe" we have an interest in learning who this might have been. The original magician, Mons. Phillippe (Jaques Noel Talon 1802-1878) did not come to Australia and it would be fanciful to imagine that Wilton had ever worked with him, but Phillippe's name is invoked again in the Somatic Conjuror explanation of "The Confectioner" trick a.k.a Shower of Sweets, which Phillippe originated.
Another consideration, though no proof can be found, is whether Wilton might have had any passing involvement with Mons. Philippe De Barr who was in Melbourne in early 1858 and had the Production of Eggs in his repertoire. In the same way, The Somatic Conjuror refers to a "De Beer" as somebody Wilton had worked with; and as no person of this name can be identified, perhaps "De Barr" was implied. The only other faint variation of "De Beer" might be the great American clown and humourist, Charles De Vere, who did tour in Australia.

The final name given on the title page of the book is that of Professor Ion, and here we have a genuine, though minor, magician of the same era in Melbourne. Historian Will Alma (10) dismisses Professor Ion as a small-time operator from Fitzroy who worked the gold-fields region. Alma makes the condescending remark, “Nos citur ex sociis” which might be loosely translated as “a man is known by his associates”; and, to be sure, H.B. Wilton’s theatrical history is one of constant effort to grow into an entrepreneur of more importance than the small variety troupes, minor magicians, and partly-successful theatrical ventures with which he was associated. Professor Ion, however, was a respectable and well-received magician; we will examine his relationship with Wilton later in this essay.

Aside from W.A.Chapman, perhaps the last connection between Wilton and other magicians of the time was his disparaging remarks in the 'Somatic Conjuror' :
"About three years since, a gentleman connected with the Art of Legerdemain, performing at the Polytechnic Institute, in Melbourne, was pleased to style himself The Man of Miracles, and one of the supposed miracles perpetrated by him was the so-called Spiritual Vision, or Second Sight, with this exception-his medium, instead of being on the stage, was out of sight. Upon his receiving the article for description, he returned it to the owner, and, placing a telescope to his eye for an instant, looked round the hall, as he asserted in search of the spirit that was to give the replies. He then proceeded to ask the question in a leading manner, so that the answer would be confined to the simple affirmative or negative of Yes or No, which was conveyed by sounds, sometimes produced by a blow from a hammer on the ground, or the striking of a glass tumbler or other article at hand; but each sound being distinct from the former, was to lead to the belief that a different spirit in each case replied."
Wilton used this performer as a prime example of someone deceiving the public with the pretence of spiritualism; but the performer in question was an Irishman under the Germanic name of Herr von Kehl, whose appearances at the Polytechnic were greeted with derision by the press. "The spiritualism", wrote The Age of April 26, 1865, "was a transparent delusion, and it is not too much to say that the rest of the performance was an obvious illusion, or delusion also … he clearly has no right to the title of a 'man of miracles'. "

In June 1868 Wilton started advertising for a wanted "Comic and Characteristic Singer" to appear at the Royal Colosseum Theatre at 283 Bourke Street, where he was putting together a variety cast for the grand re-opening of that refurbished hall, under the title of "Manager". The Colosseum would go on to cater to a mainly working-class audience for many years, finally becoming the Victoria Hall and the Melba picture theatre until it closed in 1978. Wilton did put together a sizeable troupe including Emma Weippert and the Wieland Troupe of acrobats.
The term 'manager' seems to refer mostly to the management of whatever company was playing at a theatre, and is probably closer to the modern-day term 'producer'. By August the Colosseum's manager was shown as Charles Wright, and Wilton would go on to lease a number of other theatres to house his current attractions; in January 1869 he was at the Lyceum Theatre in the Varieties Hotel, Spring Creek which was a bustling goldrush town ("… a most horrible place", wrote Wilton. (12) "We are walking up to the calves of our legs in dust … our entertainment 'Matrimony' is crowding the hall nightly").
In April 1869 he had the Bijou Theatre at Ballarat, playing farces, song and dance and a burlesque of "Golden Hair".

Constantly moving on to the next great opportunity, Wilton made his closest-ever association with Robert Heller, when he was listed (11) as the Agent for Mr. William Adam Chapman in his "Temple of Magic" in Melbourne at the fairly prestigious St.George's Hall which, for a year, was re-named as Weston's Opera House under the ownership of Frank W. Weston (13). Weston, among other interests, was known as the "Wizard Oil Prince" for his patent medicine.

Chapman's show was a direct copy of Heller's, and during November the two played in opposition at Weston's and at the Apollo Hall. Chapman was performing both "Second Sight" and "The Spirit Sack", neither of which seemed to offend Wilton's sensibilities concerning spirit fraud.
In December, Chapman and Wilton moved over to Ballarat at the Mechanics' Institute, but Chapman became entangled in a legal dispute with Weston and was hauled into court on a charge of larceny, and Wilton was required to testify as a witness. (Chapman was later cleared of the charges). That seems to have been the end of the association, and by mid- January 1870 Wilton was engaged to join a Minstrel company as agent, general manager and Buffo Vocalist, the main artistes being Mr N La Fuelliade, late violinist and composer from Weston's Opera House, Emma Weippert and Professor Vaughan and his trained canaries; their first stop was Ballarat, then to Launceston in March 1870.

This was the time at which "The Somatic Conjuror" was being released, but Mr. Wilton being a man of numerous talents, assisted Mr La Fuelliade by writing the lyrics to the ballad "She Whispers of Home" which had some lasting success, and some bland lyrics to the "Flying Squadron Galop" (publisher Charles Troedel), which was just one of at least four musical works under that name, by different composers.

During 1870 a dispute arose between the bondholders of the Duke of Edinburgh Theatre, formerly the Haymarket Theatre, in Bourke Street, over who should have the rights to lease or use the theatre. The complex issues seems to have revolved around an alleged monopoly held by George Coppin. Ultimately Mr. Wilton slipped in and acquired the lease to the theatre and announced a grand re-opening night on May 14, with burlesque, comedies, vaudeville, farce, and grand spectacular ballets. His advertisement was headed "No Monopoly Theatre" and pricing was geared to attract the common man. An advertisement of May 28 included a tribute to Wilton from his company, praising him for "destroying a monopoly that for so long a time has succeeded in keeping out of employment a large number of the theatrical profession, and has been the means of driving almost all the responsible members of it out of the colony."
It was of no use; by June the theatre was again closed through lack of patronage - and in 1871 the Haymarket complex, which had never achieved its potential, burned to the ground.




More could be written of H.B. Wilton, but having gone past the 1870 publication date of The Somatic Conjuror, it is time to move on, only noting his publication in 1872 of an interesting paper called "The New Era of 1972" in which he predicted some wonderful improvements of the current time, with the arrival of ships of immense burthen, and exciting races between balloons"; also his participation in a new "Dramatic, Operatic, Musical and Equestrian Association" of which Coppin was the Chair.


There is one final twist in the H.B. Wilton story. His real name was not H.B.Wilton.


Boyle Robertson Patey
It emerges, through throw-away remarks in the press, that Henry B. Wilton was in fact Mr. Boyle Robertson Patey and previously John Patey. (14) The name "Wilton" was reserved for his theatrical business activities and stage appearances, while Mr Patey had a life history just as complex and busy as Wilton's.

His early history is blurred, but some reports place him as having been employed in a printing house in England where part of his duties included going to the home of Charles Dickens to collect his latest writings. Ostensibly he also involved himself in the Chartist movement in England.

However, by a combination of facts, we can confirm that "Boyle Robertson Patey" is the same as the "John Patey" who arrived in Australia as a convict. A court report from 1857 mentions Patey speaking of his being sentenced to nine month's hard labour for misuse of records in the Police Office. This detail is a precise match to the Conduct Record of convict John Patey, so we can trace him back to birth.

John Patey's birthdate is unclear, c.1828-31 (his conduct record (15) states his age in 1850 as 19, but according to his first marriage registration in 1854 he was 28) and his "native place" is recorded as St. Clement's Danes", a poor urban parish in London. His trade is listed as Law Clerk.
He was tried on July 5, 1847 at the Central Criminal Courts on a charge of larceny (theft of a watch belonging to his master whose name, it should be noted, was Joseph ROBERTSON Hadfield, of High Holborn) and as he had a previous larcency conviction resulting in six weeks' confinement, he was sentenced to seven years  and was transported to Hobart, Tasmania aboard the Blenheim, arriving July 24, 1850. This was a time towards the end of the convict transportation era, so it is likely that he was put to work using his literacy skills. In early 1853, John Patey was given nine months' hard labour in chains, for permitting persons to have access to the records of the Police Office where he worked. On August 1, 1854, Patey was given his certificate of freedom.

He seems to have then been able to make himself useful by working as an English Master at a Hobart school and, though he married Jane Small on September 18, 1854 soon after his discharge, by 1855 Jane was charged with failing to obey the terms of a travel pass, and the cause seems to have been that Patey refused to allow her to travel; Jane was sentenced to nine months. By 1856 Patey had been accused of deserting his wife.

Patey ran "The London Labor Office" in Liverpool Street Hobart, and was paid to look after the private boxes at the theatre. Patey went insolvent in 1857, which may have prompted his entry on the stage. The cause of his insolvency may be that Patey is said to have issued the very first "Penny Paper" in Australasia, titled "The Penny Despatch", though it consisted of a single issue. Out of this emerged two court cases - the first, a claim by Patey for thirty pounds in damages from the printer who, it was claimed, had not produced an article up to the standard required (3600 copies was mentioned). This case was lost by Patey and may have been financially costly for him.

The second case was a defamation case, again by Patey, claiming that an employee of the Mercury newspaper had put up nine placards around the district stating that Patey had misappropriated some money and that he was known to the police; and that as a result some of his pupils were withdrawn from his school. This case was won by Patey, but the damages awarded were nothing more than a single farthing
However, in the proceedings of the case, Patey was cross-examined and these fascinating details were given- "came to this colony as a prisoner; I was once in the police force in this colony at Franklin; whilst in the force I got two sentences, one of nine months in chains for misconduct; I got that for … showing police records out of the office. I was removed from on board a ship when about leaving this colony under the name of Hutchins." (Hobart Courier June 23, 1857). Here we have our confirmation that he was the same man as John Patey.
Patey's whole history during the 1850s and early 1860s is full of litigation against others, court proceedings and arguments which indicate that he was a combative character. He stood for local government at one point but appears to have been unsuccessful.

Patey and Professor Ion
The title page of ‘The Somatic Conjuror’ referred to H.B. Wilton as “Agent and Coadjutor to Professor Ion”, amongst other magicians. Indeed, this was true, and gives us another clue as to where Patey/Wilton learned his secrets. However the relationship between Patey and Ion was a further example of the scandals which began to engulf Patey in 1865-1866.
Professor Ion, of Melbourne, had been making a tour of the Tasmanian townships since May 1865 and was regularly praised in the press. At some point, Boyle Patey made an arrangement to be Ion’s agent and, on July 17 Professor Ion opened at the Mechanics’ Institute, Launceston, supported musically by a local piano maker and pianist, Albert Francis Weippert. As it happens, Patey would soon marry Weippert’s sister, Emma, a singer who had some moderate theatrical success.

Also assisting, in the role of the Professor’s Aide-de-Camp “Mephistophiles”, was Patey, who according to the Cornwall Chronicle of July 19, “kept the audience in amusement by a series of humorous songs, anecdotes, and jocular comments on the Professor and the extraordinary implements he used in his magical transformations.”
 
The Launceston performances were poorly attended, due to the showman’s nemesis, inclement weather. On July 22 it was reported that “finding the audiences were too small to pay current expenses, the Professor left his lodgings abruptly on Wednesday morning; and it is supposed [correct] he proceeded to Melbourne by the Black Swan. He has left his familiar, ‘Mephistophiles,’ behind him with the Temple of Magic and some stage properties. The latter were detained by the committee of the Institute for a balance of rent of the Hall, left unpaid by the Professor.”

In fact, Professor Ion had other reasons, and he returned to Launceston on August 11 with an explanation in the ‘Examiner’  of August 12. “As his recent sudden departure from the colony may have caused some prejudice against him, we have been requested to state that he went away in order to rid himself of an undesirable agent [ie, Patey], who, on the strength of an agreement entered into by Professor Ion to employ him during the whole of his (the Professor’s) tour in Tasmania, had, therefore, no alternative but to terminate the engagement by leaving the colony for a short time, and we have it on good authority that he did this by the advice of several respectable residents in this town. The very fact of Mr. Ion’s return is of course a satisfactory refutation of any insinuation that he wished to leave his creditors in the lurch.”
So, once again, Patey had been involved in some acrimony. He and Mr. Weippert attempted to make some continued appearances. They advertised themselves as ‘the company formerly identified with Prof. Ion previous to his sudden disappearance’, for shows at the Railway Hotel Deloraine (August 2), the Berriedale Inn Assembly Rooms in Westbury on the following night, and a proposed series of entertainments in the Western Districts prior to sailing for Melbourne. “On each occasion”, said the advertising, “Mephistophiles, the Aide-camp of Prof.Ion, purposes giving a thorough exposure of the Art of Legerdemain!!!”
 
Upon Professor Ion’s return, Patey aligned himself with an Amateur Christy’s minstrel concert at the Cornwall Assembly Rooms on August 17, at which “Mephistophiles will appear and exhibit sufficient tricks in legerdemain to constitute a drawing-room entertainment.” Perhaps hoping to take a few pot-shots at Professor Ion, Patey is said (16) to have exerted himself to make the occasion a success but:- “At four o’clock on the day of performance the other professional met us for a last rehearsal, and went away, as we supposed, to return at 6 p.m., but failed to put in an appearance at all. In consequence of this latter gentleman being the pianist the difficulty was insurmountable … every effort was used to find him without avail.”
 
Perhaps the pianist concerned was Mr. Weippert. In any case the Christy’s concert failed, Mr. Weippert continued to reside in Launceston, there was no tour of the Western Districts, and by October, Boyle Robertson Patey had established an office in Launceston as a Law Writer and Accountant, where he remained until he was forced to make a hasty departure from Tasmania in June 1866.

In June 1866, the man now known as "Boyle Robertson Patey" went a step too far, and the Tasmanian Morning Herald of June 6 reports:
"A scoundrel, well known in Hobart Town as Boyle Robinson [sic] Patey, has lately absconded from Launceston. An assault case was tried at the last session of the Supreme Court at Launceston, which involved one of the Members of the House of Assembly. In order to raise the wind [ie, to make himself some money], Patey republished a report of the trial in the form of a pamphlet, adding to it a tissue of lewd abominable falsehoods which, for obscenity, exceeds anything that was ever before produced in the colony. The gentleman … immediately instructed his solicitor to take preliminary steps to bring the miscreant to justice. It is presumed that Patey got some inkling of the fate in store for him, and absconded by the Black Swan on Monday, having made a good harvest in Launceston by the sale of his obscene publication. Patey was well known in Hobart Town as a common swindler. His last dodge here was to get a subscription raised to pay for his departure hence. And he was so obnoxious that a number of citizens readily gave a trifle each to get rid of him, he giving a solemn undertaking never to return. This rascal will no doubt be soon recognised by the Police on his arrival in Victoria ... his last appearance in Melbourne was in a clerical disguise where, in the assumed character of a Minister of Religion, he imposed for some weeks - until recognised and exposed by a gentleman from Hobart Town - upon the credulity of a Baptist congregation." (17)

The scandal in question concerned Mr. W.L.Murray, whom Patey seems to have accused (in his pamphlet) of mis-treating and starving his wife, and possibly that his own parents were never married. On June 18, the Melbourne Age published an offended letter from Patey defending himself against the Tasmanian Herald's story. It is notable that he used the name of Patey, and his John St. Launceston address - but in fact he was already in Victoria, having just given his June 12 debut at Geelong under the assumed name of Wilton.
Mr Murray was rapidly defended in the Cornwall Chronicle of July 7, a whole series of supporters writing to uphold his reputation and quoting the details of the registered marriage of Murray's parents. One supporter wrote, "I can of my own knowledge say that the whole of it [the pamphlet] is a tissue of gross untruths; at most a thread of truth interwoven with a web of lies...".

And so we have the most plausible reason why Mr. Patey became known as "H.B. Wilton". His welcome in Tasmania was worn out, and it was only days after the above article was published, that "Mr Wilton" made his appearance onstage with the Sedgwick Dramatic Company.

Patey eventually moved into his theatrical ventures, and at last relinquished his calling as an actor to join the legal profession with Field Barrett, under which role he apparently conducted his business as a theatrical leasing agent. Newspaper reports speak of him as having edited the first dramatic journal published in Victoria [unnamed], and having once sub-edited the Hobart "Daily News".

Hettie Patey

Boyle Patey, with his wife Emma Patey/Weippert, fathered Hettie Patey, who would become a member of the Gaiety Girl company and marry Adelaide tenor Mr. T. Leslie Middleton in 1895. They had another daughter, Emma Louise, and sons Bert and Fred. Bert made his career as a stage comic, while Fred was regularly seen in Melbourne plays and pantomimes during the 1920s.

Patey was a member of the Grand United Order of Oddfellows for 37 years, rising to the rank of Deputy Grand Master. His final years were dedicated to the Collingwood "Homes of Hope" for children, and he passed away, a loved and well-respected citizen, on June 7, 1919. His wife Emma survived him until September 27, 1939.

What, then, is left to say of Mr H.B. Wilton, author of a little booklet exposing some of magic's secrets? There seems to be no evidence that he was writing out of malice towards Heller in particular, or anyone in general, for the numerous magicians he worked with were all affected by the secrets revealed. For all his moral reasoning about why the Somatic Conjuror was needed, Wilton doesn't seem to have spent any more time pursuing the anti-psychic cause. When all is said and done, The Somatic Conjuror was probably published because it was Wilton's current ambition to become better known, because his nature was to publish controversial pamphlets in order to raise some money, and because he had access to the secrets of his fellow magicians … and, like the modern-day exposers of magic, it was published "because he could".




REFERENCES

(1) The Age, Melbourne, November 18, 1869

(2) Dean Carnegie's "The Magic Detective Blog" has more information about the electrical techniques used in Heller's Second Sight, and 'The Somatic Conjuror' makes reference to a more mechanical device by which the assistant could be passed information.
The earlier source for a detailed description of Second Sight is Henry Ridgely Evans' book "The Old and the New Magic", The Open Court Publishing Co (Chicago) 1906, pages 189-200.

(3) Bernard Reid has thoroughly documented Heller's New Zealand trip in "Conjurors, Cardsharps and Conmen"

(4) The Melbourne printing and publishing firm of Clarson, Massina & Co., at 72 and 15 Little Collins Street Melbourne, was formed by the split of the Melbourne and Sydney branches of Clarson, Shallard and Co. in about 1866. William Clarson left Melbourne for Sydney in 1872, and the firm became A. H. Massina & Co. in 1876.
Their output included plays, poems, and music including the 'Weston and Hussey Minstrels Book of Songs' No.1 and 2, in September 1869. They were a firm intent on promoting local Australian writing and content.

(5) Brian McCullagh, in "Under the Southern Cross: Australian Published Magic Books 1858-2000" published privately in 2001, lists on page xi the titles "Magical Grammar or the Fashionable Science of Parlour Magic" (John Henry Anderson 129th edition c.1858), "The Wizard's Pocket Book" (Washington Simmons 1863), "Robert Heller - His Doings " c.1869, and "The Somatic Conjuror" by H.B.Wilton 1870, as the earliest known Australian-published magic books.

(6) "The Magic Circle Mirror, official organ of the Magic Circle of Victoria, incorporating Will Alma's Magic Review." The magazine ran from March 1971 - January 1977 and was effectively compiled, edited, printed and filled by Alma with not much input from others. His extensive series of articles on the "history of magic and magicians who have appeared in Australia" is one of the most important documents of Australian magic research, and is based on the large W.G.Alma Conjuring Collection now located at the State Library of Victoria.
Alma's writing about Robert Heller, in the issues for April 1972, November and December 1972, and January through June 1973, is probably the most, and possibly the only, detailed examination of Heller in Australia, although he focuses on the Melbourne shows, and much more might be written.

(7) Not to be confused with W.H. Fuller, champion roller skater, who was brought to Australia around the same time by George Coppin.

(8) Bendigo Advertiser, August 6, 1866


(10) The Magic Circle Mirror, March 1973

(11) Ballarat Courier December 2, 1869 p.3

(12) The Herald (Melbourne) January 20, 1869.


(14) Patey family history links at:

(15) John Patey's convict records including his Conduct Record are at https://www.linc.tas.gov.au/archive-heritage/guides-records/Pages/census.aspx

(16) Launceston Examiner August 22, 1865

(17) This claim about Patey impersonating a cleric appears to have some basis, as the Hobart Mercury of June 1, 1865, has an announcement about insufficiently-stamped letters, one being from "Rev. B.R.Patey, Hobart Town".























Back to content